FlySafair, the low-cost carrier that has soared to capture a substantial 60% of the South African aviation market, finds itself embroiled in controversy as competitors push for its aviation license to be suspended over alleged foreign ownership. At the heart of the matter is whether FlySafair has gained an unfair advantage, tipping the scales in its favor while its competitors struggle to keep pace.
Since its inception in October 2014, FlySafair has navigated the turbulent aviation industry with finesse, carving out a niche in an environment where margins are slim and competition fierce. However, accusations of unfair practices have dogged the airline, especially as it expanded its market share amid the collapse of several competitors, exacerbated by the challenges posed by the Covid-19 pandemic.
Now, rivals Airlink and Global Airways, parent company of domestic airline Lift, are taking a stand, urging authorities to investigate FlySafair's ownership structure. They argue that foreign investors predominantly own FlySafair, potentially violating South African aviation laws mandating a minimum of 75% local shareholding for domestic airlines.
Central to their complaint is the assertion that Safair Operations, FlySafair's parent company, does not meet the local ownership requirements stipulated by the Air Services Licensing Act. According to their allegations, only a fraction of Safair's ownership, approximately 25.14%, is held by South African entities, falling well short of the mandated threshold.
Moreover, Airlink and Global Airways contend that the opaque nature of the remaining ownership, held by a trust, further complicates matters. They argue that the lack of clarity regarding voting rights and economic interests within the trust undermines transparency and potentially violates regulatory standards.
This isn't the first time FlySafair has faced scrutiny over its ownership structure. In 2013, legal challenges brought by competitors Comair and Skywise forced FlySafair to reorganize its ownership to comply with local regulations. However, concerns have resurfaced following changes in ownership dynamics, prompting calls for a fresh investigation.
Airlink and Global Airways are demanding decisive action from authorities to rectify FlySafair's alleged non-compliance. They seek remedies ranging from suspension or cancellation of FlySafair's aviation license to fines or penalties, aiming to level the playing field and ensure equitable treatment among industry players.
In response, FlySafair has maintained its compliance with all relevant regulations and emphasized transparency regarding its ownership structure. Kirby Gordon, the airline's chief marketing officer, asserts that FlySafair has consistently adhered to regulatory requirements and stands ready to address any concerns raised.
As the aviation industry grapples with shifting dynamics and intense competition, the outcome of this dispute will have significant implications not only for FlySafair but for the broader landscape of South African air travel. It underscores the delicate balance between fostering competition and safeguarding regulatory integrity in a sector fraught with challenges.
The hearing scheduled for May 10 will serve as a pivotal moment, determining the course of action and shaping the future trajectory of FlySafair and its competitors in the South African skies.
Comments