In the wake of the land invasion that erupted on Friday, March 1, tensions between residents and land invaders in Lourierpark have reached a critical juncture. Today, the situation escalated as residents barricaded entrances with burning tires and issued threats to forcibly remove the invaders.
The scene at Lourierpark was one of heightened tension, with police armed with rubber bullets and stun grenades struggling to maintain order. Bloemfontein reporters on-site witnessed the volatile situation unfold.
Resident Kamohelo Mamatu expressed feeling blindsided by the sudden influx of people into the area and voiced concerns about the uncertain trajectory of events. Many residents echoed similar sentiments, adamant in their refusal to accept the presence of the invaders.
Despite the chaos, the so-called invaders remain resolute in their determination to establish dwellings in the area. However, political and community leaders are taking decisive action to address the crisis.
The Democratic Alliance (DA) and other stakeholders have initiated measures to compel the Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality and the South African Police Service to enforce a court order obtained by the city to address the illegal land invasion in Lourierpark.
Ward councillor David Mc Kay denounced the municipality's delayed response to prevent and halt illegal land grabs as unacceptable. He emphasized the need for immediate action, holding Executive Mayor Gregory Nthatisi accountable for the crisis.
"In light of the Free State High Court ruling on March 2, 2024, the Sheriff and SAPS have been authorized to expel illegal occupants from the area," stated Mc Kay. He further asserted their commitment to petition the court for strict adherence to the existing order, emphasizing Sections 2.4 and 2.6.
The situation in Lourierpark remains tense as residents, authorities, and land invaders stand at odds. As stakeholders mobilize to address the crisis, the fate of the contested land hangs in the balance, with implications for the broader community and the rule of law.
Comments